Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed

Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed - Hello, friend of Key Solution, in the article you are reading this time with the title Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed, we have prepared this article well for you to read and retrieve information from it. which we write, you can understand. Alright, happy reading.

Title : Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed
link : Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed

Read it too


    Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed

    Can the science of hate help us realise who the bigger criminal in a lynching is?
    • Original article by Sumaiya Shaikh, published July 18, 2017
    • Rebuttal to the original by Shruti Muralidhar – below
    • Sumaiya Shaikh responds to the rebuttal, published July 19, 2017

    This is in response to Sumaiya Shaikh’s article in The Wire titled ‘The Cognitive Neuroscience of a Lynching’. She has attempted to explain the human behaviour seen in acts of extreme violence, such as lynching. As a trained and practising neuroscientist who works in the field of learning and memory, I find that a lot of the neuroscience in her article is unsubstantiated, outdated or plainly incorrect. Following are some chosen paragraphs from her write-up, accompanied by my comments.


    That's all Articles Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed

    Past stories Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed this time, hopefully can benefit you all. okay, see you in another article posting.

    in the article you are reading this time with the title Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed with the link address https://keysolution4u.blogspot.com/2017/07/debate-why-neuroscience-of-lynching.html

    Related Posts :

    0 Response to "Debate: Why the ‘Neuroscience of Lynching’ Article Is Flawed"

    Posting Komentar